| Harris County AFL-CIO Council |
Houston ISD Kills Agreement with UnionsHISD BOARD WORKSHOP TURNS INTO FIRING SQUAD AIMED AT UNIONS Houston ISD Board President Lawrence Marshall invited the Harris County AFL-CIO Council to present information at a Board of Education workshop on Prevailing Wages and the 2007 Bond Agreement Partnership reached in October. The Agreement, that was signed off on by the Administration, called for the use of current U.S. Department of Labor Davis-Bacon Prevailing Wages, Apprenticeship training for HISD graduates to build the new schools, wage enforcement and funding for the Career and Technical Education Programs of the District. The workshop (August 20) was called to explain the agreement to the Board for placement on the agenda. AFL-CIO representative Richard Shaw made the presentation. Agreement good for the District and the Students When the Unions arrived, they found that they were facing a firing squad of industry representatives set to attack the agreement and the Unions. Shaw began by laying out the Agreement and why HISD endorsed it at a news conference. Emphasis was made on the Apprenticeship wages in the agreement and enforcement of the wages so that workers would not be cheated. He pointed out that this was not a union-non union issue at all but about good wages, keeping students in school and job training. Shaw recounted the documented shoddy and dangerous electrical installation work performed in 4 recently opened schools where children and staff were put in danger with serious wiring and grounding issues. He recounted a report from Lantrip Elementary where the water fountain was shocking students shortly after it opened. Shaw also pointed out how the undocumented workers who were installing the electrical work were unlicensed and were being cheated out of the Districts low $15.17 per hour wage only receiving $9-11 per hour. Finally, he urged the District to adopt current Prevailing Wages (like the County, the City, METRO and others have done) since their wages are 11 years out of date. He pointed out how such wages attract quality workers and quality construction and also train Apprentices that could be recruited from the neighborhoods. He recounted how the Unions helped win passage of the agreement and how the District benefited from the reputation of the AFL-CIO as an honest broker when it comes to job training and good wages for construction workers. All was going pretty good as the 9 Board members listened intently until industry representatives began. Industry lines up to protect itself Leading off the industry speakers was Ber Pieper, representing the HISD Bond Oversight Committee and the Associated General Contractors. His testimony recounted how great Brown and Root is and how the District did not need Prevailing Wages and that the wages were just fine for the workers represented. He also touted the quality of the construction and that there were many undocumented immigrant workers living in HISD who benefited from these low wages. Jerry Nevlud, of the Associated General Contractors was up next. He said that his contractors (most of them non-union) did not prefer to pay prevailing wages and that, in summary, the District was doing just fine with its low wages since school construction was different from other construction. The third representative, Ousley Lacy from the National Association of Minority Contractors admitted that they did not believe in Prevailing Wages and that they would not pay them. None of these industry representatives addressed Apprenticeship training and/or why it was preferable to employ undocumented immigrants (and cheat them too) over HISD graduates who would like high skill and high paying construction jobs. Other speakers included the District’s Business Development person and Finance Department who presented a skewed analysis of the cost of paying workers Prevailing Wage when they could use their outdated and their underpaid wages. District effectively cancels Agreement Finally, Richard Lindsay spoke. He said that he had made a mistake in signing the agreement (he had done so at the direction of Dr. Saavedra, who is the outgoing Superintendent) and that he was sorry. He then apologized to the Board for doing so. He said that he would not recommend the Agreement to the Board today. Several Board members responded that he was forgiven and that everyone makes a mistake sometime. It then turned into a virtual love fest for Richard Lindsay and the Bond program. Dr. Abe Saavedra, who negotiated the Agreement, sat silent and lame like a duck. General tone was degrading toward Unions and members Overall, the general tone of industry and some of the Board members was degrading and insulting towards Unions and their members. In effect, they spit in their faces after they and the District used Labor to lend credibility to their Bond referendum when very few other community organizations would.
|
|
© AFL-CIO. All rights reserved.
Photographs and illustrations, as well as text, cannot be used without permission from the AFL-CIO. |